I spent the last academic year, until last week, at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, teaching cyberlaw and domestic and international telecom law. It’s part of a great opportunity I was offered to help launch a space & telecom law program at the law school.
People wonder: why Space & Telecom together. One answer is: satellites are governed by space law and by telecom law.
A second answer: look outside Omaha, about an hour from Lincoln, and notice US Strategic Command. Let me quote part of their mission:
The missions of US Strategic Command are to deter attacks on US vital interests, to ensure US freedom of action in space and cyberspace.
This is space and cyberspace from a military perspective. I’m guessing I’m one of the few cyberlaw professors to teach cyberwar law in my classes and to follow developments in the field. (Outer space military law is someone else’s expertise. As is space law in general.)
So I want to highlight an article from a few weeks back, in the New York Times, which is one of the better recent articles I’ve seen on cyberwarfare.
Marvin Ammori 